Source: www.vactruth.com

With Christmas nearly here and the flu season well and truly under way, Sanofi Pasteur is playing Santa Claus this year. Not only is the drug giant offering free flu vaccines to children, but they are paying parents $350 to use them as guinea pigs in flu vaccine trials!!!!

With many health departments already out of flu vaccines this year, parents in Overland Park, Kansas are allowing their children to have the untested vaccines instead. One official said clinical trials may be the way to go for some parents.

Radiant Research is conducting phase three testing of a new quadrivalent influenza vaccine. Dr. Carl Petit, the lead investigator for Radiant Research, reassures parents that the side effects, if any, are only minimal. A parent will rake in $350 per child (between the ages of six months and eight years old) participating in the research program.

Mrs. Myers, with twin boys Joshua and Josiah, are regulars in various vaccine trials. She is confident that no harm will come to the boys. She says:

“I trust Radiant Research, I wouldn’t be afraid to let them decide what was best. They wouldn’t do anything that was too scary for me as a mum.”

Radiant is testing the vaccine as part of a four month blind study in 20 different locations. The vaccine is said to offer children more protection and more immunity than anything currently on the market. Full coverage of the story is on Action News (http://www.youtube.com/watch…).

Is Mrs Myers being a good, caring parent looking out for her children? Many would think not. Especially after watching the news report where her little boy is seen whimpering with two adults holding him down to vaccinate him. As they vaccinate him he squeezes a stress ball in his left hand. A reporter is heard on the voice over saying:

“It is stressful, six years old, knowing your right arm is a bullseye for needles.”

The child squeezes the ball faster saying:

“Are you done now, are you done?”

The twin’s mother may feel comfortable using her children as lab rats while pocketing a nice $700, but just how safe are these “ever so safe” trials?

Last year in similar trials German businessman Axel ended up coughing up blood… He said:

“The vaccination has made me ill! – the test is irresponsible, I felt totally beat. On the third day, my kidneys and head were aching and I got a fever. I then had a coughing fit – and the wash basin was suddenly red – it was blood!”

See A Participant in the H1N1 vaccine trials has an adverse reaction and coughs up blood (http://www.americanchronicle.com…) for the full story.

In 2008, a physically fit UK father of three died after he took part in a drugs trial for RhuDex, a new drug treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Mr. Munro was allegedly paid £2000 to take part in the trial.

He died at home in Edinburgh after suffering two heart attacks.

The Times (http://www.timesonline.co.uk…) who took up the story at the time said:

Mr Munro, a keen exerciser with no history of cardiac problems, was reportedly paid £2,000 to take part in the trial of RhuDex, a new drug treatment for rheumatoid arthritis, at the Charles River clinic, in Tranent, outside Edinburgh. His family are pursuing legal action over his death and have demanded that the clinic be closed.

The tragedy is likely to raise fresh concerns over the safety of testing medicines in clinical trials. Six healthy volunteers almost died two years ago after receiving TGN 1412, a rheumatoid arthritis and leukaemia drug.”

Parents of young children should realise that drug and vaccine trials are carried out for a reason. The drugs and vaccines being tested have not been approved. They are untested, therefore no one can guarantee that they are safe. Dr Carl Petit, the lead investigator for Radiant Research has no right misleading parents. He should not be allowed to make false and irresponsible statements such as “side effects are minimum, if any.” The truth is he doesn’t know.

Last year found 7515 adverse events from FLU vaccines on the VAERS Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. This was reported by National Vaccine Information Centre (http://www.rulabinsky.com/vaersdb…)

I would have thought that parents could find a better Christmas present than this for their child? Stressing a young child purposely while inflicting pain, and possibly illness and disability, is disturbing on many levels. From almost any other perspective, this deliberate act would be seen as child abuse. Is this protecting your child from the flu? No! This is selling your child’s body to science!

| edit post

H1N1 vaccine linked to 700 percent increase in miscarriages

Posted by wicked blu Wednesday, December 8, 2010 0 comments

www.naturalnews.com

Recent data presented to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Advisory Committee on Children's Vaccines has revealed some shocking information about the effects of the H1N1 / swine flu vaccine on pregnant women. According to the report, the rate of miscarriage among pregnant women during the 2009 H1N1 / swine flu pandemic soared by over 700 percent compared to previous years, pointing directly to the vaccine as the culprit -- but the CDC denies the truth and continues to insist nobody has been harmed.

According to the CDC, nearly 50 percent of all pregnant women were vaccinated with the H1N1 vaccine during the 2009 / 2010 influenza season. Those whose physicians instructed them to get a seasonal flu shot were three times more likely to get it, while those instructed specifically to get the H1N1 shot were ten times more likely to get it. And the numbers clearly show that along with the rise in vaccinations due to the H1N1 scare came the sharp increase in miscarriages, including a slew of actual reported adverse events.

But the CDC does not seem to care about the facts, as numerous reports indicate the agency has failed to report any of this vital information to vaccine suppliers. In fact, when presented with the data for the third time, Dr. Marie McCormick, chair of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Vaccine Risk and Assessment Working Group, actually had the audacity to claim that there were no vaccine-related adverse events in pregnant women caused by the vaccine.

"This baseless and fallacious assessment by the CDC assessment group has given the green light to the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) to continue their recommendation to give the 2010/11 flu shot to all people, including pregnant women," explained Eileen Dannemann, director of the National Coalition of Organized Women, presenter of the information.

"This upcoming 2010/11 flu vaccine contains the same elements that are implicated in the killing of these fetuses, the H1N1 viral component and the neurotoxin mercury (Thimerosal). Additionally, it contains two other viral strains -- a three-in-one shot for all people."

Overall, the number of vaccine-related "fetal demise" reports increased by 2,440 percent in 2009 compared to previous years, which is even more shocking than the miscarriage statistic. Meanwhile, the CDC continues to lie to the public about the vaccine, urging everyone, including pregnant women, to get it.


| edit post

Saying NO to the Gardasil vaccine

Posted by wicked blu Sunday, December 5, 2010 0 comments

Source: www.healthiertalk.com

It's an absolute outrage! Sixteen more deaths have been linked to Gardasil.

That brings the total deaths linked to this vaccine to more than 50. And yet somehow the medical mainstream is able to look the other way and still tout the party line that girls should be getting this shot!

How crazy can they be!?

A new study finds that more than 70 percent of young women who are eligible for the HPV vaccine are giving it a big "NO." What's more, many women who get the first of the required three-shot series never go back for the remaining shots.

But instead of applauding the girls' decision NOT to put themselves at risk, the mainstream is stupefied by this news. They're aghast and "saddened." They're scratching their heads, wondering, "What is WRONG with these girls?"

Here's the right question: What's wrong with these ridiculously entrenched mainstreamers? Especially when we consider the truth of the situation in relation to those that have received the Gardasil vaccine....

"Records Document 3,589 Adverse Reactions Related to Gardasil between May 2009 and September 2010, Including 213 Cases Resulting in Permanent Disability"


| edit post

Source: www.wddty.com


Forty children have died after a routine vaccination such as MMR and 2,100 more have suffered a serious reaction, UK health authorities have been forced to disclose this week – and these figures are just the tip of the iceberg.
Two of the vaccinated children have been left with permanent brain damage, and 1500 others have suffered neurological reactions, including 11 cases of brain inflammation and 13 cases of epilepsy and coma. Overall, there have been more than 2,100 adverse reactions to a childhood vaccine in the UK in the last seven years.
The UK’s Medicine and Healthcare Products Regulatory Authority (MHRA) was forced to reveal the figures following a request from a journalist under freedom of information legislation.
The true picture is likely to be far worse. The MHRA cases are only those that doctors have reported; if the doctor does not believe the vaccine has caused the reaction, he will not report it. It is suspected that just 10 per cent of all deaths and reactions from vaccines are ever reported; if so, this means that 400 children have died from a vaccine and 21,000 have suffered an adverse reaction in the UK alone. The true situation will be far worse in countries such as the US where childhood vaccination is compulsory.
Last month, the UK government was forced by a court to pay damages to a mother whose son was left with severe brain damage after an MMR vaccination. Another 500 similar cases are currently going through the UK courts.
These figures represent a major setback in the relationship between doctors and parents. Most parents have accepted the reassurances of doctors and health authorities that the vaccines are safe, and that they are doing the best for their child and the community.

Now, if things go wrong, they may be less inclined to believe the doctor’s denials that the vaccine is to blame.

| edit post

Boys are the Next Targets for the HPV Vaccine

Posted by wicked blu Saturday, November 20, 2010 0 comments

Source: www.hsi.com

So they've made the vaccine, lobbied hard to get people to inject their daughters with it. Yet still, not "enough" girls are lining up for their Gardasil shots.

Fear not! Dr. Matt Daley — a paediatrician — has an idea for increasing the number of girls who are vaccinated with Gardasil, Merck's human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine.

He recently recommended they should be vaccinated at school. He said: "Children are there, and they are there every day. They are a captive audience."

Trapped and inoculated

Does he have any idea how completely scary that sounds? Trap them in school where they can be subdued and inoculated?

Of course, this solution supposes that the only reason nearly 90 per cent of all eligible girls have not received a Gardasil vaccine is because the girls are just so elusive. As if they're wild horses, nearly impossible to chase down and lasso.

Dr. Daley seems to miss the point that most girls don't make the decision about whether or not to get the shot — their parents do. And clearly, parents are weighing the considerable risks and expense on one hand against the feeble efficacy on the other, and figuring out that there's only one certainty about Gardasil: It makes a lot of money for Merck.

Shooting at bees

Dr. Daley's bright idea for increasing Gardasil numbers comes out of a discussion prompted by this question posed in a recent media report: Should boys also get vaccinated for HPV?

Well, the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has already rubber stamped this one with a big YES. Last year, Gardasil was approved for use in boys and men, ages nine through 26, to prevent genital warts.

Dr. Doug Lowy also answers the question with a YES.

No surprise there. Dr. Lowy is the co-inventor of Gardasil, so I expect he stands to reap generous rewards if many thousands of children are given his vaccine every year.

Here's his thoughts: Only 11 per cent of eligible girls are getting all three doses of Gardasil. That's not going to lower HPV rates very much. So let's give it to boys because then they'll be less likely to transmit HPV to girls.

Less likely, maybe, but not guaranteed. And that's how it goes with this insane vaccine. It's touted as a way to reduce rates of cervical cancer, but it's like using a shotgun on a swarm of bees. You might hit a few, but the swarm goes on.

The most disturbing thing about the Gardasil-for-boys question is that we don't yet know if the drug is as dangerous for boys as it is for girls. Many girls vaccinated with Gardasil have experienced dizziness, fainting, convulsions, paralysis, and seizures. Nearly 50 girls died after their vaccinations, although the FDA claims there's no proof Gardasil was the cause.

No proof. You're the parent of a teenage boy — you're wondering if you should have him vaccinated so he MIGHT avoid genital warts — and the FDA tells you there's no "proof" that Gardasil has taken the lives of dozens of young women.

So...how do you feel about that? Should YOUR boy get vaccinated for HPV?

Girl or boy — same answer — just say no.

And trying to trap your children in school and forcefully vaccinate them is just the latest in a string of dictatorial ways of getting them on Gardasil.

| edit post

source: NVIC.org
by: Barbara Loe Fisher

Part 1 of 4


Part 2 of 4

| edit post

www.naturalnews.com

Vaccination rates among children insured by commercial health insurance plans have dropped four percent between 2008 and 2009, says a new report by the National Committee for Quality Assurance. In its annual State of Health Care Quality report, the organization revealed that vaccine rates are falling sharply among high-education families.

This trend infuriates the vaccine industry and all the shills who push vaccines, of course. Despite all their high-dollar propaganda, expensive advertising and vaccine booths in airports, Wal-Marts and grocery stores, more and more people are coming to realize that many vaccines are dangerous for children and the seasonal flu vaccines in particular offer absolutely no scientifically-validated benefit whatsoever. They are pure quackery and nothing more.

The really interesting thing about this trend is that parents with a higher education are consciously choosing to protect their children from vaccines. Remarkably, the vaccine industry insists that "they're the stupid ones" because they don't believe the vaccine propaganda. But as it turns out, the American people are smarter than the vaccine industry thinks, and as they're learning the truth about seasonal flu vaccines, they're making informed, intelligent decisions to protect their children from such vaccines.

| edit post

Welcome


Thank you for visiting 'Do Not Inject Me'

The purpose of this site is to bring to your attention the dangers of all vaccines, pharmaceutical drugs and some of the severe effects they can have on you as a human being.

Along the way we hope to provide you with health articles regarding alternative and natural remedies, and that you find the information presented here a great resource in empowering you to become a more active and healthier being.


Say No!

Say No!

Natural News

Dr. Mercola

Vac Truth

Christina England

Followers