Posts
Source: American Chronicle
By Christina England
The panic buttons have been pressed and the public have panicked but instead of this enormous pandemic, killing hundreds of thousands of people worldwide, we have seen very few deaths from the giant ‘pig’ of a disease that we were threatened with and instead we have seen a mere ‘piglet’ of a disease as it was described recently, killing far fewer people than a normal flu outbreak.
Many of us, have been left wondering if instead of a the killer pandemic , the Swine Flu, was little more than a ruse to tuck yet another vaccine into the already crammed full schedule. If so, it has certainly been effective, as a vaccine to protect us all from this deadly disease appeared as if by magic and was advertised as the must have protection against this ‘killing machine’ of an illness. However, it appears that the Swine Flu is not the threat that we were led to believe and has since disappeared into little more than a whimper of an illness.
Channel 4 news reported that only 6,200 people worldwide have died from swine flu. These were the figures reported by the World Heath Organisation. However these figures are extremely minimal when compared to those deaths expected to be seen from an annual flu epidemic.
The WHO have also reported that worldwide, Influenza kills about 250,000 to 500,000 people in an annual epidemic.
The Daily Mail reported that the Swine Flu pandemic has turned out to be less lethal than first feared. “About 1 percent of the population in England has had swine flu with symptoms, of which 0.026 percent died, the research added.”
Well that certainly puts things into perspective doesn’t it?
The H1N1 vaccine that was brought in to protect the world against this so called ‘monster disease’ on the other hand has proved to be yet ‘another vaccine disaster’ as adverse reactions from around the world rise at an alarming rate. Deaths and serious side affects have been reported worldwide including Guillain Barre Syndrome and Anaphylaxis.
One leaked document which turned out to be a swine flu vaccine insert, shows admissions of Guillain Barre Syndrome, Anaphylaxis, Death, and much more.
Profitable Harm Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine
This is extremely worrying as this proves beyond doubt that these adverse reactions were clearly known about before these vaccines were given to vulnerable groups of the general public. These include the chronically ill, babies, the elderly and pregnant women. This also makes the following adverse reactions from around the world even more tragic.
The China Daily reported that China mainland has seen 3,631 adverse reactions from the vaccine.
The Flu Case report that in Sweden 5 people are said to have died after the swine flu shot compared with only 3 that have died from the complications of the Swine flu itself.
The Daily Telegraph has reported that one person has died after the swine flu vaccine and 1300 have had adverse reactions.
Dr Mercola reports that deaths and serious side affects including GBS from around the world are now beginning to emerge.
The Canadian press are still reporting problems with the vaccine stating they now have had 24 cases of anaphylaxis after the swine flu vaccine and one reported death.
MSNBC reports that a teen now suffers from the rare illness Guillain Barre Syndrome after becomming ill just hours after after the shot.
The Mail on Sunday reported this week that because of adverse reactions the UK Government has recommended that children receiving the swine flu vaccine should now only be given half the original dose.
One paragraph from this article states
“Meanwhile, the medicines watchdog.the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency MHRA, reported four people had died after receiving the Pandemrix vaccine, although all had serious underlying health conditions and the deaths are not being linked to the jab.”
No disrespect here but of course the people who died after the vaccine had underlying illnesses, as these are the people that are currently being vaccinated.
As shown on the Government website
“Swine flu vaccinations have begun for people in high-risk groups, such as people with chronic conditions and pregnant women. You will be contacted by your GP if you are in a high-risk category. Vaccination of children under the age of five will begin once vaccination of these groups is complete.”
It seems to me that Governments target the most vulnerable first and then when they die they immediately blame the underlying cause as being the reason for their death. This is in my opinion to divert attention away from the vaccine in a deliberate attempt to mislead the public.
In the UK midwives are so concerned about this vaccine that they are refusing to vaccinate the pregnant women in their care despite warnings.
The Telegraph reports that Members of the online forum Mumsnet had said that their midwives had told them ‘not to touch the vaccine with a barge pole’.
On Mumsnet David Salisbury from the JCVI and the Department of Health had this to say:-
“DavidSalisbury: We do recommend that pregnant women with flu risk factors should be vaccinated every year and we know that seasonal flu vaccine is safe in pregnant women. With H1N1 swine flu virus it is clear that younger people are more likely to get the disease as opposed to seasonal flu that mostly affects older people. Some of those younger people are going to be pregnant.
The latest WHO advice shows that between 7% and 10% of all hospitalised patients are pregnant women in their second or third trimesters and pregnant women are up to 10 times more likely to need admission into intensive care than the general population.
The WHO data also shows that between 5% and 30% of the deaths are in pregnant women. This means it is really clear that pregnant women are at risk from H1N1 swine flu and it is circulating now.
We don’t test drugs or vaccines in pregnant women but we do test them on pregnant animals and this has been done with our swine flu vaccines. We also know that over 90 women became pregnant shortly after having the GSK vaccine and 50 of them have now completed their pregnancies and have normal babies. The others are still being followed up, which explains why it is so difficult to do clinical trials in pregnant women.”
So this means then if we take the worst case scenario from the figures of deaths reported by the WHO, then this actually represents 30% of 6200 people who have died from the Swine flu were pregnant, which with my mathematics is a figure of 1860 people worldwide.
Many pregnant women having had the vaccination are reporting that they have miscarried.
So are these horror stories made up? This is highly unlikely as clearly research over the years has proven it is unwise to vaccinate pregnant women.
In an article by Dr Blaylock he clearly points out the dangers of pregnant women having vaccines.
He states:-
“There is compelling research that shows that stimulating a pregnant animal during mid-term pregnancy dramatically increases the risk of the newborn having autistic or schizophrenic behaviour as it ages or reaches adulthood. The risk is increased in the order of 14-fold, which is tremendous.
We know that women who get the flu during pregnancy have a similar increase risk of their child developing autism or schizophrenia. At first, you may assume that the flu virus entering the baby’s brain would cause the effect, but careful research found that the virus does not enter the baby’s brain. Rather, it is immune cytokines from the mother’s immune reaction to the virus that causes the problem. Unlike the flu virus, the offending cytokine passes through the placenta and damages the developing brain of the baby. In essence, they found that anything that stimulated the mother’s immune system could raise the risk of autism and schizophrenia in the baby. To show that it is not the virus they stimulated the pregnant animals immune system with special chemicals alone and got the same effect.
Another set of studies found that stimulating the mother’s immune system during pregnancy not only increased the baby’s risk of having a seizure, but increased seizure risk even when the child became an adult. So we see that activating immunity, as with vaccination, can significantly raise the risk of your child having a seizure, even extending into adulthood.
Its is also known that stimulating the mother’s immune system during pregnancy can trigger preclampsia in the mother and hypertension in the baby, when the baby becomes an adult. The bottom line is vaccinating a pregnant women is vary hazardous to the mother’s health as well as the baby.
At this point you may ask but if a natural flu infection can cause this as well as vaccination, shouldn’t we protect pregnant women by vaccination? If the vaccine was effective you might make that conclusion, but there is no evidence the vaccine has any effectiveness. Pregnant women have a state of immune suppression and vaccines are notorious for not working in immune suppressed people.
Even more important is the fact that a woman’s risk of getting the flu and having the genetic risk factors for autism or schizophrenia is small overall, but if you vaccinate all pregnant women, as the CDC is calling for, you will have a large number of babies affected by autism, schizophrenia or seizures because they will all have had intense immune stimulation by the vaccine.”
Reports from all over the world are coming in about women who have miscarried shortly after they have had the swine flu vaccination. So it is a fact that these vaccinations are putting some pregnant mothers at risk. For years now we have been told not to take drugs when pregnant, not to drink when pregnant and not to smoke when pregnant but despite these warnings the drug companies promote vaccines for women who are pregnant.
To me this utter madness and totally irresponisble!
0 comments