Do Not Inject Me ! Say No To Vaccines

In the meantime, health authorities have called for the withdrawal of 170,000 (higher risk) doses of the vaccine produced by GlaxoSmithKline. The initiative, of which the importance is being downplayed, is said to have come from the manufacturer GlaxoSmithKline, which expressed concern on higher than normal adverse reactions to the vaccine.

"Canada's H1N1 flu vaccine manufacturer has asked the provinces to temporarily discontinue vaccinating Canadians from a lot of vaccine shipped in October due to a higher risk of adverse reactions, says a Manitoba health official.

Dr. Joel Kettner, Manitoba's chief public health officer, said Thursday that GlaxoSmithKline has asked that the October batch be taken out of circulation because it produced serious and immediate anaphylactic reactions in one out of 20,000 vaccinations, compared with one out of 100,000 in other shipments.

"We've been asked by the manufacturer GSK to not use this vaccine at this time pending further investigation," he said. (Winnipeg Free Press, 20 November 2009)

The government is involved in a cover-up. The initial headlines stated "more than 100,000 doses", but then read on, the number is 170,000 doses.

The CTV report admits that "it is a serious thing, it has the potential to kill".

Too Late to Withdraw the 170,000 Defective Doses The question is whether the doses can be withdrawn or whether they have already been used. The first news reports from Manitoba indicate that: Of the 63,000 doses shipped [to Manitoba], only 630 remained unused by the four regional health authorities in Manitoba that received them. (Ibid)

This report would suggest that the risky GSK vaccine doses have already been used.

A subsequent report confirms that out of the 63,000 doses, 900 unused doses of the H1N1 were withdrawn by health authorities "after health authorities received word other vaccines from the same batch have been causing higher rates of allergic reactions than expected." (Flu vaccine batch pulled in Manitoba, Winnipeg Sun, 20 November 2009).

The question is what happened to remaining 62,100 doses of the higher risk vaccine batch, which were used to vaccinate people in Manitoba?

Has there been a follow-up regarding those people in Manitoba who received the higher risk H1N1 vaccine injection.

Manitoba Health authorities casually confirm, in this regard, that "most of the vaccine Manitoba received from the suspect lot had already been used by the time the province received the alert on Wednesday" [November 18, 2009]. (Winnipeg Free Press, 20 November 2009, emphasis added) 

Manitoba and Quebec: Three deaths resulting from the H1N1 Vaccine 

The news reports have highlighted deaths allegedly resulting from the H1N1 flu, while obfuscating several recorded deaths resulting directly from the vaccine. These vaccine related deaths are occurring at the very outset of the vaccination program,.

According to CTV News, 20 November 2009) "The province is currently investigating two deaths -- both adults who died within seven days of getting the H1N1 shot" (Family questions if H1N1 shot caused Manitoba woman's death, November 20, 2009, emphasis added).

Manitoba officials acknowledge 69 "adverse events" after people received the swine flu shot, including the two deaths. (CBC.ca report,17 November 2009)

However, unless the families speak out, the authorities will not provide details. CTV interviewed the family of one of the victims. No details on the other death in Manitoba are available:

"The family of a 38-year-old Manitoba woman who died five days after receiving the H1N1 vaccine are looking for answers as to why it happened.

Soo Lee Wong and her daughter, Angela Truong, both got the H1N1 shot on November 5th.

The family says Wong, who had diabetes, started getting sick a day after getting vaccinated and died a few days later.

Doctors told the family Wong died of a blood infection. More tests will be done to see if the vaccine played any role.

Wong's husband, Thoon Truong, is also caring for his seven-year-old daughter Angela, who has been in the hospital with a fever and swollen, painful legs. He wants to know whether the two cases related to the vaccine or to something else.

The province is currently investigating two deaths -- both adults who died within seven days of getting the H1N1 shot.

Although it's still early, Manitoba's chief medical officer of health Dr. Joel Kettner says immunizations were not likely the cause of the deaths. CTV News | Family questions if H1N1 shot caused Manitoba woman's death, November 20, 2009)

It should be noted that these two deaths in Manitoba may have been associated with the injection of the higher risk H1N1 vaccine doses, which health authorities had called for withdrawal. 

Quebec: One Death 

An 80-year-old Quebec man was reported dead after taking the H1N1 Swine Flu vaccination. Health officials have dismissed the case,"stating that it's too soon to link the death and vaccine." Quebec man dies after taking H1N1 vaccine, Digital Journal, 18 November 2009). 

The Quebec health authorities have refused to provide details: 

"Quebec's Director of Public Health Protection, Dr. Horacio Arruda,did not know why the man took the vaccine and that final test results,which are expected to come in December, will determine whether or not the man died from the vaccine. Canada.com reports the man died in the last three weeks but provincial officials declined to reveal details, citing confidentiality concerns. Arruda has said that most allergic reactions occur right away, which is the reason why many patients are asked to stay in the centres, “We can't say there is a causal association between the death and the flu shot.”

Nevertheless, Arruda is confident that the death will not discourage people from taking the vaccine but urged that serious reactions to the H1N1 shot are rare, “I understand that everyone is worried.”" (Quebec man dies after taking H1N1 vaccine, Digital Journal, 18 November 2009)

The statements by senior health officials are notoriously ambiguous: while they concur that: "there is no evidence the vaccine is dangerous.", they nonetheless acknowledge the deaths resulting from the vaccine (Statement of Quebec's Director of Public Health Protection, Dr. Horacio Arruda, (The Canadian Press: Quebec health officials investigating possible death from H1N1 vaccine. November 18,2009).

The dangers of this type of government protected experimentation is especially transparent when it comes to pregnant women, where no data, except the NOT very reassuring reproductive toxicity pre-clinical trials on rats existed before the experimental vaccine was tried out on a massive scale on pregnant women: those whom we must protect the most from all types of known and unknown drugs/pharmaceutical products.

Four pregnant women in Belgian are currently engaged in a legal action to obtain NON-EXPERIMENTAL, standard procedure H1N1 flu shots, without adjuvants, and preferably no thiomersal either.

In his article on www.mondialisation.ca , Dr Beeth quotes a paragraph in English from a study showing that offspring from pregnant rats that were given Pandemrix had an increased incidence of foetal malformations: the quote is taken from page 18 of this GSK patient information PDF in Canada: 

http://www.gsk.ca/english/docs-pdf/Arepanrix_PIL_CAPA01v01.pdf 

In a report in French, Beeth quotes a paragraph from a study showing that rats who were given Pandemrix had an increased incidence of fetal malformations.

There have been no clinical trials on pregnant women.

Pharmaceutical companies such as GSK might be expected to carry out these trials if there is evidence of such fetal malformations in rats. Their failure to do so suggests a deliberate attempt to manipulate clinical trials data to get an dangerous drug through to cause damage to pregnant women.

Four pregnant women in Belgian are planning legal action against the government for recommending the dangerous Pandemrix to pregnant women without adequate data. 

This is an extra from the report in French 

“Two reproductive studies were conducted with ASO3-adjuvanted H5N1 antigen and evaluated the effect on embryo-fetal and peri-and post-natal development in rats, following intramuscular administration. Although no definite conclusion could be reached, regarding a possible relation to treatment with the H5N1 vaccine and/or the adjuvant ASO3, and other findings were considered normal, the following observations deserve to be mentioned:

In the first study, there was an increased incidence of fetal malformations with markedly medially thickened kinked ribs and bent scapula as well as an increased incidence of dilated ureter and delayed neuro-behavioural maturation.

In the second study, there was an increased incidence of post-implantation loss, and the fetal variation of dilated ureter. Not all findings were observed in both studies, and hence the toxicological significance is uncertain.”

Yet because the World Health Organisation has declared a pandemic, big pharmaceutical companies may be able to ask for immunity from prosecution and/or paying compensation in cases where vaccine causes severe side effects. Chilling. To see the film, before it is deleted go to http://vimeo.com/7298827 or continue to read this article to view embedded video.

Don't be bullied into doing what you feel is wrong for your kids.

Stab in the Thigh 

No babies like to be vaccinated. So it is with Lykke Larimar Wiencke-Lygre. Although she is too young to understand, screaming she already iltert before intensive care nurse Hildur Grindheim put the syringe in his thigh.

Her parents, Hilda Beate Lygre and Fredrik Wiencke, follows both the daughter of vaccination on Children Clinic.

They say that the advance was little doubt they would say yes to their little girl would be to test. But after talking with both health nurse, who follows up Good luck, and the doctor, they said yes.

- We found that Succeed risk of becoming ill from the vaccine is less than the risk that she will get the flu, says her mother.

Feel Safe

The parents also think it is reassuring to ensure close follow-up that comes with testing.

Even before Lykke was vaccinated yesterday, she had to take several blood tests including checking that she was well at the first injection spot.

Until she is 11 months, she will regularly be followed up by staff at the Children’s Clinic. In four months, she returned to Children’s Clinic to take new vaccine dose. New blood tests have also to measure the effect of the vaccine.

Home has Good Lykkes brother Carl August in six years. He is an active first grader at Memorial School. He’s already been vaccinated because he is at risk.

- We have also received the vaccine. Therefore, it is nice that the little sister has been given the opportunity to be protected against the infection already, “says the parents.

The family also love to travel. The first road trip of Lykke is the United States in February.

- We would at least like her to be vaccinated before we left. But she would not become old enough to fill the public the criteria to be vaccinated before departure date. But now we know that she most likely will be immune when we go on a long voyage. We think the vaccine is a good insurance against infection, “says Lygre and Wiencke."

Pioneer Program

At Haukeland is professor and senior physician Ansgar Berg and his colleagues at the research record for children at Children’s Clinic proud that they have the professional responsibility to conduct this important study. Rikshospitalet University Hospital is also involved in the survey. And in addition to the tiny babies who are vaccinated in Bergen and Oslo, to toddlers from Lier and Hønefoss be with. 

Berg explains that regular vaccination procedures should be followed in the study approved by the Norwegian health authorities. The smallest of half the vaccine dose, twice. 

Best practices

Berg is not surprised that Norway has been chosen to test the vaccine in this age group.

- In this country we have very good procedures for vaccination of children, “he says

Although the study includes only 60 children, experts believe that the scale is sufficient to test both the efficacy and side effects. Thus, even the smallest part in the mass vaccination if necessary, “he says.”

Access to adequate amounts of vitamin D is also believed to be beneficial towards reducing the risk of cancer.

Norman also lists 36 organ tissues in the body whose cells respond biologically to vitamin D, including bone marrow, breast, colon, intestine, kidney, lung, prostate, retina, skin, stomach and uterine tissues.

According to Norman, deficiency of vitamin D can impact all 36 organs. Already, vitamin D deficiency is associated with muscle strength decrease, high risk for falls, and increased risk for colorectal, prostate and breast and other major cancers.

An unrelated study also suggests that low vitamin D is associated with Parkinson’s disease. The majority (55 percent) of Parkinson's disease patients in the study had insufficient levels of vitamin D.

Meanwhile, the American Academy of Paediatrics has doubled its recommendation for a daily dose of vitamin D in children, in the hopes of preventing rickets and promoting other health benefits.

The new guidelines now call for children to receive 400 international units (IU) of vitamin D per day, beginning in the first few days of life.

“ … Evidence has shown this could have life-long health benefits," said Dr. Frank Greer of the American Academy of Paediatrics.

It’s a tragedy that dermatologists and sunscreen manufacturers have done such a thorough job of scaring people out of the sun. Their widely dispersed message to avoid the sun as much as possible, combined with an overall cultural trend of spending more time indoors during work and leisure time, has greatly contributed to the widespread vitamin D deficiency that’s seen today.

There are only 30,000 genes in your body and vitamin D has been shown to influence over 2,000 of them. That is one of the primary reasons it influences so many diseases (as seen in the table below). 

• Vitamin D deficiency is epidemic in adults of all ages who have increased skin pigmentation, such as those whose ancestors are from Africa, the Middle East, or India, who always wear sun protection, or who limit their outdoor activities.
• African Americans and other dark-skinned people and those living in northern latitudes make significantly less vitamin D than other groups.
• 60 percent of people with type 2 diabetes have vitamin D deficiency.
• Studies showed very low levels of vitamin D among children, the elderly, and women.
• One U.S. study of women revealed that almost half of African American women of childbearing age might be vitamin-D deficient.

Vitamin D and Cancer

Given that cancer, heart disease and diabetes are three of the top causes of death in the United States, ensuring that you are getting enough of this crucial vitamin should be a top priority.

A study by Dr. William Grant, Ph.D., internationally recognized research scientist and vitamin D expert, found that about 30 percent of cancer deaths -- which amounts to 2 million worldwide and 200,000 in the United States -- could be prevented each year with higher levels of vitamin D.

Vitamin D has a protective effect against cancer in several ways, including:

• Increasing the self-destruction of mutated cells (which, if allowed to replicate, could lead to cancer)
• Reducing the spread and reproduction of cancer cells
• Causing cells to become differentiated (cancer cells often lack differentiation)
• Reducing the growth of new blood vessels from pre-existing ones, which is a step in the transition of dormant tumors turning cancerous

Beyond cancer, the researchers pointed out that increasing levels of vitamin D3 could prevent diseases that claim nearly 1 million lives throughout the world each year! And other studies showed that you can decrease your risk of cancer by MORE THAN HALF simply by optimizing your vitamin D levels with sun exposure.

As we enter into flu season in the United States, you should know that your vitamin D levels play a direct role in your risk of getting the flu.